Trial reportThe American journal of cardiology2025
Home-Based Exercise and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Peripheral Artery Disease: The LITE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in The American journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02538900 (Low InTensity Exercise Intervention in PAD), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Low InTensity Exercise Intervention in PAD
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Peripheral Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), we evaluated the effects of 12 months of walking exercise at a pace inducing ischemic leg symptoms (high intensity) on the attainment of meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and 6-minute walk, compared to walking exercise at a comfortable pace (low intensity) and a nonexercise control. Participants completed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to evaluate objective walking ability. PROMs included the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) distance and speed scores (range 0 to 100, 100-best, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) = 15 and 11, respectively). 240 participants (61.7% Black, 48.3% female) participated. High intensity exercise increased 6MWT compared to control (+44.8 meters (95% CI:21.7,68.0) and compared to low-intensity exercise (+37.6 meters [95% CI:18.6,56.5]). Low intensity exercise had no significant benefit compared to control (+7.3 meters [95% CI:-16.3,30.9]). High intensity significantly increased attainment of the MCID for the 6MWT compared to low intensity (OR:2.43 [95% CI:1.35,4.38]) and compared to control (OR:5.22 [95% CI:2.32,11.76]). Compared to control, high intensity exercise significantly increased the odds of attaining an MCID for the WIQ distance score (OR:2.30 [95% CI:1.05,5.04]) and WIQ speed score (OR:2.94 [95% CI:1.27,6.83]). Compared to low intensity, high intensity did not significantly increase the odds of attaining an MCID for the WIQ distance (OR:0.93 [95% CI:0.53,1.66]) or the WIQ speed score (OR:1.31 [95% CI:0.71,2.43]). In conclusion, in people with PAD, high intensity walking exercise increased the odds of meaningful improvement in PROMs compared to control, but not compared to low-intensity exercise. Despite this, high intensity exercise improved 6MWT more than the low intensity exercise and nonexercise control groups (NCT02538900).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.