ReviewHeart rhythm2025
A call for transparency, improved reporting, and interpretation of trials using surrogate end points in cardiac electrophysiology.
Review in Heart rhythm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient and public involvement and engagement in methodology research: process, experiences, and recommendations from the SPIRIT- and CONSORT-Surrogate project.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this call for transparency, we aim to disseminate knowledge about recent CONSORT-Surrogate and SPIRIT-Surrogate checklists. SPIRIT-Surrogate is an extension of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist, developed as a consensus document and designed as a reporting guideline for randomized controlled trial (RCT) protocols using surrogate end points as the primary end points. CONSORT-Surrogate is an extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist, a consensus-driven reporting guideline for RCTs using surrogate end points as the primary end points. We discuss the definition of surrogate and target/final end points in cardiac electrophysiology (EP) RCTs. We review historical examples of surrogate paradoxes in the cardiac EP field and consider the theoretical framework of a surrogate paradox. Furthermore, we consider the bioethics of transparent reporting of clinical trial protocols and results. A nonlethal cardiac arrhythmia and its burden (eg, atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular contractions, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) is a surrogate end point unless justified otherwise. Therefore, clinical investigators in the cardiac EP field need to implement the SPIRIT-Surrogate and CONSORT-Surrogate extension checklists for transparent reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.