ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Low Rates of Aborted Endoscopy Due to Gastric Food Retention in Patients on Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Narrative Review of Risks, Management Strategies, and the Need for Clinical Consensus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use has dramatically increased with expanded indications for weight loss. Delayed gastric emptying due to these medications can lead to residual food in the stomach, which can increase the risk of periprocedural aspiration during endoscopic procedures. The aim of this study is to document rates of gastric food retention and aspiration events during upper endoscopy in patients on GLP-1 RA.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients who underwent upper endoscopic procedures at two hospitals during 2018-2023. Procedure abortion due to the presence of food was taken as primary study endpoint. The secondary endpoint was aspiration events in patients with food noted on endoscopy.
resultsOut of a total of 32,275 total upper endoscopic procedures performed during the study period, 1179 procedures were performed in patients taking GLP-1 RAs (GLP-1 cohort). In total, 37 endoscopies (0.1%) were aborted due to retained gastric food; 7 patients (0.6%) in the GLP-1 cohort vs 30 patients (0.096%) in the non GLP-1 cohort (p < 0.01). There were no episodes of aspiration in patients with retained food.
conclusionsIn a large retrospective cohort, GLP-1 RA use did increase rates of gastric food retention during upper endoscopy, though the absolute risk was minimal. There were no aspiration events related to gastric food retention. Because of the small number of events, there were no clear modifiable risk factors for gastric food retention. This study supports the practice of individualized periprocedural management in patients on GLP-1 RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40021603What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.