ArticleScientific reports2025
Microbiome analysis of gut microbiota in patients with colorectal polyps and healthy individuals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbial Composition, Oxidative Stress, and Immunity in Metabolic Disease: Toward Personalized Interventions.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of gut microbiota on atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: a comprehensive analysis of microbial composition and metabolomic profiling.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Virulome over taxonomy: refining the driver-passenger model in colorectal carcinogenesis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Lactulose selectively stimulates members of the gut microbiota, as determined by multi-modal activity-based sorting.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Metabolomics analysis of gut metabolites in patients with colorectal polyps and in healthy individuals.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Polyps: Unveiling the Causal Connection.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Characteristic metabolite profile of 10 colorectal cancer-related bacteria.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- TMOD2 and DOCK4 as Novel Gut Microbiota-Associated Biomarkers for Colorectal Adenoma: Integrated Transcriptomic Analysis and Therapeutic Target Identification.Mediators of inflammation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal polyps serve as the primary precursors for colorectal cancer. A close relationship has been observed between colorectal polyps and gut microbiota. However, the composition and role of the microbiome associated with tubular adenoma are not well understood. In this study, we prospectively evaluated alterations in gut microbiota among patients with colorectal polyps. A total of 60 subjects were enrolled in this study, including 30 patients with colorectal polyps (CP group) and 30 healthy controls (control group). The 16S rRNA sequencing was employed to characterize the gut microbiome in fecal samples. The results revealed that the beta diversity of the gut microbiota in the CP group significantly differs from that of the control group (p = 0.001). At the phylum level, the relative abundance of Bacteroides, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria was higher in the CP group compared to the control group (p < 0.05), whereas the relative abundance of Actinobacteria was higher in the control group in comparison to the CP group (p < 0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacteroides increased in the CP group (p < 0.05), while Bifidobacterium declined in the CP group (p < 0.05). At the species level, the abundance of Clostridium perfringens, unidentified_Bacteroides, unidentified_Dorea, Escherichia coli, Clostridium ramosum, and Ruminococcus gnavus was higher (p < 0.05), whereas the abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, unclassified_Bifidobacterium, Bifidobacterium longum, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and unidentified_Bifidobacterium is lower in CP group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There was a structural imbalance in the composition of intestinal colonization flora for CP patients, characterized by a decrease in beneficial bacteria and an increase in harmful bacteria. Escherichia, Shigella, and Bacteroides may serve as promising biomarkers for early detection of colorectal polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.