Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40021742›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Microbiome analysis of gut microbiota in patients with colorectal polyps and healthy individuals.

Dayi Deng, Lin Zhao, Hui Song, Houming Wang, Hengjie Cao, Huimin Cui, Yong Zhou, Rong Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Polyps: Unveiling the Causal Connection.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dayi Deng *Department of Surgery, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222 Bole Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201800, China.
Lin Zhao *Department of Surgery, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222 Bole Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201800, China.
Hui SongDepartment of Surgery, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222 Bole Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201800, China.
Houming WangDepartment of Surgery, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222 Bole Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201800, China.
Hengjie CaoDepartment of Surgery, Longhua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Huimin CuiDepartment of Surgery, Jinan Licheng District Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250000, China.
Yong ZhouDepartment of Surgery, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222 Bole Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201800, China. 13916853065@163.com.
Rong CuiDepartment of Surgery, Jiading Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 222 Bole Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201800, China. 13585551944@163.com.

Funding

Natural science research project of Jiading District, Shanghai JDKW-2022-0030Natural science research project of Jiading District, Shanghai JDKW-2023-0051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal polyps serve as the primary precursors for colorectal cancer. A close relationship has been observed between colorectal polyps and gut microbiota. However, the composition and role of the microbiome associated with tubular adenoma are not well understood. In this study, we prospectively evaluated alterations in gut microbiota among patients with colorectal polyps. A total of 60 subjects were enrolled in this study, including 30 patients with colorectal polyps (CP group) and 30 healthy controls (control group). The 16S rRNA sequencing was employed to characterize the gut microbiome in fecal samples. The results revealed that the beta diversity of the gut microbiota in the CP group significantly differs from that of the control group (p = 0.001). At the phylum level, the relative abundance of Bacteroides, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria was higher in the CP group compared to the control group (p < 0.05), whereas the relative abundance of Actinobacteria was higher in the control group in comparison to the CP group (p < 0.05). At the genus level, the abundance of Bacteroides increased in the CP group (p < 0.05), while Bifidobacterium declined in the CP group (p < 0.05). At the species level, the abundance of Clostridium perfringens, unidentified_Bacteroides, unidentified_Dorea, Escherichia coli, Clostridium ramosum, and Ruminococcus gnavus was higher (p < 0.05), whereas the abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, unclassified_Bifidobacterium, Bifidobacterium longum, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and unidentified_Bifidobacterium is lower in CP group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There was a structural imbalance in the composition of intestinal colonization flora for CP patients, characterized by a decrease in beneficial bacteria and an increase in harmful bacteria. Escherichia, Shigella, and Bacteroides may serve as promising biomarkers for early detection of colorectal polyps.

Indexed as

BacteriaColonic PolypsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAgedBacteroidesCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SColorectal polypsGut microbiotaMicrobiome analysis

Identifiers

PMID40021742
PMCPMC11871317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.