Observational studyScientific reports2025
Establishing metrics of clinically meaningful change for treating knee osteoarthritis with a combination of autologous orthobiologics.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Platelet Lysate-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Precision Medicine in Orthobiologics: A Paradigm Shift in Regenerative Therapies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Predicting Long-Term Benefits of Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis: Three-Year Follow-Up on Pain Relief and Mobility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous bone marrow concentrate (BMC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet lysate (PL) have emerged as promising orthobiologic treatment options for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The present observational study reports minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) values for several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to monitor changes in joint pain and function following percutaneous treatment of knee OA with a combination of BMC and platelet products (n = 295 knees). Distribution-based approaches were used to determine 12-month MCID values for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Numeric Pain Scale (NPS), and modified Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Alternatively, a within-cohort, anchor-based approach, leveraging the modified SANE as a global transition question, was used to determine MCID values of 12.2, 8.4, and - 1.8, and SCB values of 29.5, 22.5, and - 3.0 for IKDC, LEFS, and NPS, respectively. Approximately 87% of treated knees reported change scores that met or exceeded an MCID value while 59% reported change scores that met or exceeded an SBC value for one or more PROMs. In reporting MCID and SCB values for PROMs following the treatment of knee OA with a combination of BMC and platelet products, we sought to provide a foundation for assessing the clinical efficacy of orthobiologic interventions in this developing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.