ReviewJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025
A perspective review on the systematic implementation of ctDNA in phase I clinical trial drug development.
Review in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Investigational CRISPR-Cas9-edited T cells for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: Clinical insights for future development.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Molecular Profiling: Emerging Advances in Circulating Tumor DNA Detection.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Immune interception in cancer: prioritizing vaccination in high-risk and premalignant settings.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Comment on "Nivolumab adjuvant to chemo-radiation in localized muscle-invasive urothelial cancer: primary analysis of a multicenter, single-arm, phase II, investigator-initiated trial (NEXT)".Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Optimizing early-phase immunotherapy trials: the role of biomarker enrichment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) represents an increasingly important biomarker for the screening, diagnosis and management of patients in clinical practice in advanced/metastatic disease across multiple cancer types. In this context, ctDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling is now available for patient management decisions, and several ctDNA-based companion diagnostic assays have been approved by regulatory agencies. However, although the assessment of ctDNA levels in Phase II-III drug development is now gathering momentum, it remains somewhat surprisingly limited in the early Phase I phases in light of the potential opportunities provided by such analysis. In this perspective review, we investigate the potential and hurdles of applying ctDNA testing for the inclusion and monitoring of patients in phase 1 clinical trials. This will enable more informed decisions regarding patient inclusion, dose optimization, and proof-of-mechanism of drug biological activity and molecular response, thereby supporting the evolving oncology drug development paradigm. Furthermore, we will highlight the use of cost-efficient, agnostic genome-wide techniques (such as low-pass whole genome sequencing and fragmentomics) and methylation-based methods to facilitate a more systematic integration of ctDNA in early clinical trial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.