ArticleBehavioral and brain functions : BBF2025
Sex differences in reward-based operant conditioning performance and neurotransmitter changes following chronic sleep restriction stress in rats.
Article in Behavioral and brain functions : BBF, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estrous cycle stage gates the effect of stress on reward learning.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep deprivation significantly impairs cognitive function, which disrupts daily life. However, sex differences in these impairments are not well understood, as most preclinical studies primarily use male animals, neglecting potential differences between sexes. This study aims to investigate sex-specific differences in cognitive function under sleep deprivation using reward-based operant conditioning tasks.
resultsSprague-Dawley rats were pre-trained on a lever-press task and subsequently divided into control and chronic sleep restriction (CSR) groups. The CSR group underwent 14 days of sleep restriction. After CSR modeling, rats were assessed using the open field test, retraining on the lever-pressing task, signal discrimination task, and extinction task to evaluate motor abilities, memory formation, learning, and cognitive flexibility. CSR significantly impaired task performance in both sexes, with rats requiring more time and exhibiting lower accuracy. In the signal discrimination task, male rats showed longer feeding latency and lower accuracy compared to females. CSR also specifically increased the frequency of operant responses in male rats. In the extinction task, CSR enhanced exploration time and frequency in both sexes, with females exhibiting significantly higher exploration frequencies than males. Biochemically, CSR induced sex-specific alterations, including elevated serum MDA and MAO levels in males and increased serotonin, dopamine, and epinephrine in both sexes. Although activation was observed in metabolites of the tryptophan-kynurenine pathway, sex differences were evident in the kynurenic acid metabolism levels in the prefrontal cortex.
conclusionsCSR impairs cognitive function in both male and female rats, with significant sex differences observed. Male CSR rats exhibited impaired signal discrimination, while CSR impaired extinction learning in female rats. These impairments are accompanied by CSR-induced oxidative stress, neurotransmitter dysregulation, and disturbances in the tryptophan metabolic pathway. These findings underscore the importance of considering sex differences in understanding the effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive function and developing targeted intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.