ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
4 Steps to 4Ms: A Navigation Guide for a Hospital-Based Composite Measure of 4Ms Care and the Implications for Outcomes Assessment.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From 4Ms to 5 domains: ensuring new CMS Age-Friendly hospital measure improves care for older adults.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Age Friendly Health Systems: Pivoting from Breadth to Depth.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 4Ms Framework is the foundation of the Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) movement. While the framework is based on standalone evidence for each M, there is limited evidence about the impact on outcomes when practiced as a set. A composite measure capturing adherence to the many care processes that comprise the 4Ms is a necessary but complex component of closing the evidence gap. We offer a navigation guide that addresses key considerations for developing a hospital-based composite measure of 4Ms care. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement operationalizes the 4Ms Framework as a minimum set of Assessment and Act On care processes. In developing a composite measure of inpatient 4Ms adherence, we offer a 4 step framework with associated discussion of considerations related to composite measure type (eg, continuous, dichotomous), and synchrony within and across the Ms containing these care processes. Using real-world electronic health record data capturing care process adherence in the 4Ms implementation at a large academic hospital, we illustrate the considerations, and report the implications for sample size and composite measure scoring. We also present our selected composite measure-a dichotomous measure delineating 4Ms care when all encounter-level processes (those needing to be done only once during the hospital encounter) are followed and all day- and shift-level processes are followed for at least 50% of hospital days. While there is no single, standard approach to create a 4Ms composite at this early stage of the AFHS movement, as organizations develop their measure(s), our guide and the considerations we suggest should serve to inform this process and support progress toward meaningful measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.