Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40024381›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2025

Carotid artery stenting with open vs closed stent cell configurations in the CREST-2 Registry.

Brajesh K Lal, Gary S Roubin, James F Meschia, Michael Jones, Donald V Heck, W Charles Sternbergh, Herbert D Aronow, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, George Howard, Minerva Mayorga-Carlin and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Carotid artery stenting for heavily calcified lesions after plaque modification using scoring balloon angioplasty.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brajesh K LalDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: blal@som.umaryland.edu.
Gary S RoubinCREST-2 Interventional Management Committee, Jackson, WY.
James F MeschiaDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Michael JonesDepartment of Cardiology, Baptist Health, Lexington, KY.
Donald V HeckDepartment of Radiology, Novant Health, Winston-Salem, NC.
W Charles SternberghDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA.
Herbert D AronowDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Department of Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI.
Carlos Mena-HurtadoVascular Outcomes Program (VAMOS) & Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
George HowardDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Minerva Mayorga-CarlinDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
John D SorkinDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Baltimore VA Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Thomas G BrottDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

Funding

CREST-2 Clinical Coordinating CenterU01NS080168 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI Thomas G Brott, JAMES F MESCHIA · 2014 to 2026
$56.3M
NSTN National Clinical Coordinating CenterU01NS086872 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Joseph Paul Broderick, Pooja Khatri · 2013 to 2026
$32.3M
University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (UM-OAIC)P30AG028747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ALICE S. RYAN · 2006 to 2026
$28.9M
CREST-2 Statistical and Data Coordinating Center - SDCCU01NS080165 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI EDWARDS, LLOYD J · 2014 to 2025
$15.0M
Long-Term Observational Extension of Participants in the CREST-2 Randomized Clinical TrialU01NS119169 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI HOWARD, GEORGE, LAL, BRAJESH K · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Plaque morphologic characteristics that affect prevention of stroke by carotid revascularizationR01NS147997 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI Lloyd J Edwards, Brajesh K Lal · 2026 to 2026
$442k
CSRD VA I01 CX000407CSRD VA I01 CX001621NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028747NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS147997NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS080165NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS080168NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS086872NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS119169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntraprocedural atheroembolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS) can be reduced through careful patient selection, consideration of vascular anatomy and lesion characteristics, operator and institutional experience, peri-procedural antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy, and use of embolic protection. However, CAS can also result in stroke as the stent is deployed and embolic protection withdrawn. The free-cell area of most closed-cell stents is <5 mm

methodsThe CREST-2-Registry (C2R) enrolls asymptomatic and symptomatic patients for whom CAS is favored because of high risk for surgery or patient preference. C2R implements operator- and site-credentialing, careful lesion selection, and standardized procedural protocols. Patient characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes are recorded. Interventionists may use United States Food and Drug Administration-approved devices including open-cell stents (Rx Acculink [Abbott Vascular], Precise Pro Rx [Cordis-Cardinal Health], and Protégé Rx [Medtronic/Covidien]), or closed-cell stents (XACT [Abbott Vascular] and Wallstent Monorail Endoprosthesis [Boston Scientific]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess relate stent cell configuration to peri-procedural (30-day) stroke or death (SD).

resultsOf 5307 procedures performed by 163 interventionists across 101 clinical centers, 2054 (38.7%) received open-cell stents, and 3253 (61.3%) received closed-cell stents. In the periprocedural period, 91 patients (1.7%) experienced a stroke (3 were fatal), and 16 patients died without experiencing strokes (0.4%). After adjusting for age, sex, symptomatic status, and case urgency, and for effect-modification by indication, periprocedural SD was significantly higher when an open-cell stent was placed in a primary lesion compared with closed-cell stents (3.5 events per 100 procedures using open-cell stents [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-4.7] vs 2.2% [95% CI, 1.6-3.0] using closed-cell stents (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.13-2.23; P < .01). Periprocedural SD was not significantly different between stent types when placed in a restenotic lesion (1.2% [95% CI, 0.4-3.3]) using open-cell stents vs 4.0% (95% CI, 2.2-7.2) using closed-cell stents (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-1.01; P = .052).

conclusionsStent design influences periprocedural stroke or death in carotid stenting. Closed-cell stents are associated with a lower event rate when treating primary atherosclerosis, but not in the setting of restenosis.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisEndovascular ProceduresStentsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStrokeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCarotid stentingRegistryStenosisStent cell configurationStroke

Identifiers

PMID40024381
PMCPMC13238965

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.