SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Acceptance rates and reasons for social oocyte cryopreservation among women: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility Preservation and Assisted Reproduction Among Athletes: An Online Survey.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Age-Based Oocyte Yield in Elective Oocyte Cryopreservation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the acceptance rates and reasons for social oocyte cryopreservation (SOC) in the general population (subgroup 1) and healthcare professionals/students (subgroup 2) according to the current literature. Relevant studies published between 2007 and Sept 2023 were identified from electronic databases, including PubMed, EBSCO MEDLINE Complete, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, and CINAHL. Quantitative studies reporting women's acceptance rates and reasons for social oocyte cryopreservation were eligible. A total of 20 quantitative studies were included in this process. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to evaluate study effect sizes. A total of 20 articles were analyzed. While the acceptance rate of SOC women in the general population was 56.5% (95% CI = 47.8-64.9%; τ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.