ArticleScientific reports2025
The relationship between genetic prediction of 486 blood metabolites and the risk of COPD: mendelian randomization study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-Specific Plasma Metabolomic Signatures in COPD Reveal Creatine, Purine/Urate, and Bile-Acid Axes.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Mendelian Randomization Study in East Asian Populations Supports the Causal Relationship Between Blood Metabolites and COPD: Insights from Amino Acids, Phospholipids, Vitamin D, and Trace Elements.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic disorders are an important feature of chronic lung disease. Patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been found to experience metabolic disorders. Nonetheless, evidence on the causal role of circulating metabolites in promoting or preventing COPD is still lacking. Conducting a methodical examination on the causal connection between blood metabolites and COPD can aid in identifying fresh objectives for the screening and prevention of COPD. Therefore, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal association between COPD and 486 blood metabolites.We used two-sample MR techniques and genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to evaluate the correlation between COPD and 486 serum metabolites. To evaluate the causal impact of serum metabolites on the risk of COPD, we predominantly employed inverse variance weighting (IVW) methodology. The MR-Egger regression test was employed to assess multiple validity, while the presence of heterogeneity was examined using the Cochran's Q test. To ensure the reliability of the findings, a leave-one-out analysis was conducted. The Bonferroni correction is used to adjust for multiple comparisons, ensuring rigorous validation of our results.After filtering by IVW and sensitivity analysis, we identified 10 known metabolites including fructose, margarate (17:0), guanosine, 2-stearoylglycerophosphocholine, hexadecanedioate, lactate, 5-oxoproline, paraxanthine, phenyllactate (PLA) and N-acetylglycine. Of these, fructose, margarate (17:0), guanosine, 2-stearoylglycerophosphocholine and hexadecanedioate are risk metabolites, and additionally, lactate, 5-oxoproline, paraxanthine phenyllactate(PLA) and N-acetylglycine are protective metabolites. In addition, the study identified five currently unknown chemical structures. Cochran's Q-test showed no significant heterogeneity, and MR Egger's intercept analysis confirmed the absence of horizontal multidirectionality. Leave-one-out analysis also proved the reliability of the MR analysis.We identified seven COPD-related risks and eight protective human serum metabolites. By combining genomics and metabolism, it provides new insights into the underlying mechanisms of COPD, with important implications for COPD screening and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.