Evidence mapPaperPMID 40025422Full record

SynthesisBMC primary care2025

Patient participation in self-monitoring regarding healthcare of heart failure: an integrated systematic review.

Sophia Olofsson, Hanna Josephsson, Maria Lundvall, Peter Lundgren, Birgitta Wireklint Sundström

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophia OlofssonFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of BoråS, Allégatan 1, Borås, 501 90, Sweden.
Hanna JosephssonFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of BoråS, Allégatan 1, Borås, 501 90, Sweden.
Maria LundvallFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of BoråS, Allégatan 1, Borås, 501 90, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-2029
Peter LundgrenFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of BoråS, Allégatan 1, Borås, 501 90, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-4070
Birgitta Wireklint SundströmFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of BoråS, Allégatan 1, Borås, 501 90, Sweden. birgitta.wireklint_sundstrom@hb.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8536-1910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-monitoring in cases of heart failure (HF) can lead to improved health and early detection of states of illness, potentially avoiding unnecessary hospitalisation. Legislation emphasizes the importance of patient participation in health care. This is possible and simplified due to the ongoing digitalisation within the healthcare system. The aim of this study was therefore to describe existing research knowledge on patient participation in self-monitoring regarding healthcare of HF, in the context of digitalisation of healthcare.

methodsA systematic literature review with an integrative approach was conducted February 2021 (6 years) and April 2024 (9 years). The review consisted of 12 articles accumulated from four databases. The review was performed in line with the standards of the PRISMA statement, registration number: PROSPERO 2021:244,252.

resultsA total of twelve studies were included, both quantitative and qualitative research. The studies had a wide international spread and included a total of n = 1393 patients aged between 52-77 years, predominantly men. Various aspects of patient participation are the three themes: 'Self-care ability', 'Interaction with healthcare professionals', and 'Empowerment and Individual preferences'. The results indicate that self-monitoring has a predominantly positive effect on self-care behavior and satisfaction with care. Increased awareness and confidence in patients´ own self-care abilities were reported especially in qualitative studies. Through the use of self-monitoring, information and knowledge about HF led to increased control of the disease. Additionally, differences between qualitative and quantitative studies are demonstrated even in this partial result. The qualitative studies showed an increased understanding of disease situations, but corresponding conformity is not shown in quantitative research, and an increased level of knowledge is not yet proven.

conclusionsThe fact that there is a lack of empirical data in this field of research and that the available data is not coherent indicates that additional studies are required. In step with increased digitalisation and that great responsibility is placed on patient participation, there is a demand for patient studies that embrace a pronounced patient perspective with individual components of self-monitoring.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePatient ParticipationSelf CareAgedHumansMaleDigitalisationHeart FailureIntegrated systematic reviewPatient participationPrimary careSelf-care monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40025422
PMCPMC11871632

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.