ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Microencapsulated rrBNGF as an alternative ovulation induction method in rabbits.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrolytically Stable Organo-Chemical Surface Functionalization of Bioinert High-Performance Ceramics Enables Osseoconduction and Osseointegration In Vivo.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Review
- Effect of Recombinant NGF Encapsulated in Chitosan on Rabbit Sperm Traits and Main Metabolic Pathways.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRabbits are an induced-ovulatory species such that exogenous hormone factors are needed to induce ovulation. Traditionally, intramuscular injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are given at the time of artificial insemination (AI). To avoid the need for injections, the intravaginal delivery of molecules naturally present in seminal plasma has been explored. Here, we examined the possibility of using nerve growth factor (NGF) microencapsulated with chitosan to induce ovulation. First, the biological activity of these NGF microcapsules was assessed in pheochromocytoma of rat adrenal medulla cell (PC12) cultures, along with their effects on semen. Next, we examined the ability of the intravaginal NGF-chitosan delivery system administered at AI (NGFch-0) or 30 min before AI (NGFch-30) to elicit ovulation. To this end, progesterone concentrations on Day 7 post AI, pregnancy rates and prolificacy (kits born alive and stillbirths per doe) were determined in nulliparous and multiparous rabbit does and then compared amongst treatments: intravaginal NGFch-0 and NGFch-30, intramuscular injection of GnRH analogue, intravaginal empty-catheter (C-e) or intravaginal semen-containing catheter (C-s).
resultsNGF-chitosan promoted similar PC12 differentiation to free NGF without impairing cell viability. The presence of the NGF-containing microcapsules did not interfere with semen motility, viability or capacitation status. In our in vivo experiments, nulliparous rabbits showed similar rates of ovulating females across treatments (GnRH 90%, NGFch-30 100%, NGFch-0 66.7%, C-e 83.3%), yet higher pregnancy rates were observed in response to GnRH and NGFch-30 (90% and 100%, respectively) than to NGFch-0 (60%). Prolificacy results in these does were similar across treatments. In multiparous does, GnRH treatment gave rise to the highest rate of ovulating female and pregnancy rates (100 and 90%, respectively). In contrast, the NGF-chitosan groups showed the lowest ovulating female and pregnancy rates (NGFch-30 50% and 25%, NGFch-0 41.7% and 21%, respectively). An intermediate ovulatory response was obtained in does stimulated with the catheter (C-e 70%, C-s 57.1%), and a pregnancy rate of 20% was obtained if the catheter contained diluted semen (C-s).
conclusionsIntravaginal NGF-chitosan administered 30 min before AI induced ovulation at a similar rate to GnRH injection in nulliparous, but not multiparous, rabbit females. A better receptivity status of nulliparous females could be a determining factor for this response. However, mechanical stimulation gave rise to a high ovulation rate, so this could be masking or, in some cases, directly replacing the NGF-chitosan effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.