ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2025
Seeding amplification assay: Limitations and insights for enhanced clinical and research applications.
Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Comparison of Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assays for Increasing Reproducibility.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- Detecting the seeds of Parkinson's disease: the evolution of α‑synuclein seed amplification assay as a clinical biomarker.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Quantitative measures of total and phosphorylated alpha-synuclein in skin tissue as potential biomarkers for synucleinopathies.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of the α-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assay for Dementia With Lewy Bodies: A Comparison Across 4 Laboratories.Neurology · 2026Article
- Seeding amplification assay with Universal Control Fluid: Standardized detection of α-synucleinopathies.PloS one · 2025Article
- RT-QuIC: a highly promising diagnostic method for neurodegenerative diseases-advantages and limitations.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate diagnosis of synucleinopathies-neurodegenerative diseases marked by misfolded α-synuclein protein aggregates, such as Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy-remains a critical challenge. Conventional clinical criteria, frequently verified only through postmortem examination, results in diagnostic delays that impede timely intervention. Seeding amplification assay (SAA) has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool, offering high sensitivity for detecting α-synuclein aggregates even in early disease stages. While SAA enables early diagnosis by amplifying misfolded α-synuclein in biological samples, several barriers exist, including a lack of assay standardization, technical complexity, and difficulty differentiating among synucleinopathies. Additionally, the current SAA is primarily qualitative, limiting their ability to correlate with disease severity or progression. This review addresses these limitations by examining pre-analytical and analytical factors influencing SAA performance and exploring emerging quantitative approaches. Recent advancements include the integration of SAA with quantitative methodologies, which hold promise for enhanced diagnostic accuracy and clinical applicability. SAA's potential as a diagnostic and monitoring tool is significant and can be further improved by validation in longitudinal studies. The clinical implementation of SAA could revolutionize the early detection and management of synucleinopathies, ultimately improving patient outcomes through earlier diagnosis and tailored therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.