ArticleJournal of Brown hospital medicine2023
Telehealth during COVID-19: Perspectives on Usability by US Physicians.
Article in Journal of Brown hospital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To understand the usability of telehealth among physicians caring for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We interviewed US-based physicians specializing in emergency medicine, geriatrics, and primary care who provided care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The interview guide was grounded in the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). After conducting interviews probing their experiences delivering care using telehealth, we performed framework analysis to reveal major themes in telehealth usability. Results: Forty-eight physicians (15 emergency physicians, 18 geriatricians, 15 primary care physicians) participated in interviews from September 2, 2020 to November 20, 2020. Lack of prior use of telehealth, quick adoption of telehealth, technical deficiencies in platforms, and frequent visits with older adults made using telehealth more difficult. Physicians shared low self-efficacy when using telehealth for diagnosis in certain patient populations, like older patients, new patients, and patients with atypical presentations or non-specific symptoms. By contrast, they had high self-efficacy if they received training, had existing technical proficiency, or were meeting established patients. Key facilitating conditions include easy-to-use telehealth platforms, the inclusion of third parties-like patients' children or nurses-in virtual visits, and at-home medical devices like blood pressure cuffs or pulse oximeters. Conclusions: While physicians largely found that telehealth platforms were usable to deliver care to patients remotely, there were several technical and training-related barriers that impeded telehealth's usability at the onset of the pandemic. Simpler telehealth platforms with easy-to-use features, involvement of caregivers, telehealth training, and remote diagnostic devices increased the usability of telehealth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.