ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with New-Onset ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Missing-data-aware machine learning prediction of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning predictive model for one-month post-revascularization angina in patients who had undergone PCI or CABG.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Leveraging ensemble learning for predicting 30-day readmission in heart failure ICU patients.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with new-onset ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using four machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: Data from 250 new-onset STEMI patients were retrospectively collected. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm. Four ML algorithms-K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Complement Naive Bayes (CNB), and logistic regression-were applied to predict MACE risk. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was used to rank feature importance, and a nomogram was constructed for risk visualization. Results: Logistic regression showed the best performance (AUC = 0.814 in training, 0.776 in validation) compared to KNN, SVM, and CNB. SHAP analysis identified seven key predictors, including Killip classification, Gensini score, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), heart rate (HR), creatinine (CR), glutamine transferase (GLT), and platelet count (PCT). The nomogram provided accurate risk predictions with strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusions: The logistic regression model effectively predicts MACE risk after PCI in STEMI patients. The nomogram serves as a practical tool for clinicians, supporting personalized risk assessment and improving clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.