ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Construction and Verification of a Frailty Risk Prediction Model for Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Frailty in Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An Exploratory Machine Learning Analysis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Development and multi-cohort validation of a machine learning-based simplified frailty assessment tool for clinical risk prediction.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Research progress on risk prediction models of physical restraint in the elderly: a narrative review.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
- Modeling and validation in Parkinson's disease patients with frailty.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based predictive model for assessing frailty risk among elderly patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: From November 2020 to May 2023, a cohort of 1170 elderly patients diagnosed with CHD were enrolled from the Department of Cardiology of a tier-3 hospital in Anhui Province, China. Participants were randomly divided into a development group and a validation group, each containing 585 patients in a 1:1 ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed in the development group to identify key variables influencing frailty among patients with CHD. These variables informed the creation of a machine learning prediction model, with the most accurate model selected. Predictive accuracy was subsequently evaluated in the validation group through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: LASSO regression identified the activities of daily living (ADL) score, hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), depression, cardiac function classification, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, solitary living, and age as significant predictors of frailty among elderly patients with CHD in the development group. These variables were incorporated into a logistic regression model and four machine learning models: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost). AdaBoost demonstrated the highest accuracy in the development group, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.803 in the validation group, indicating strong predictive capability. Conclusions: By leveraging key frailty determinants in elderly patients with CHD, the AdaBoost machine learning model developed in this study has shown robust predictive performance through validated indicators and offers a reliable tool for assessing frailty risk in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.