ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2024
A panorama of colon cancer in the era of liquid biopsy.
Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colon cancer (CC) is one of the most frequent cancers worldwide being responsible for over 500 thousand deaths in 2022. Its financial and human burden is expected to increase in the next decades accompanying the growing and aging of the global population. Much of this burden could be alleviated considering that the lethality of CC is mostly due to its late diagnosis and failure in the individualized management of patients. Coordinated government actions and implementation of better diagnostic tools capable of detecting CC earlier and of tracking tumoral evolution are mandatory to achieve a reduction in CC's social impact. CtDNA-based liquid biopsy (LB) has great potential to contribute to patients' screening adhesion, CC earlier detection, and to longitudinal tumor follow-up. In this review, we will discuss the latest epidemiological data on CC disease, diagnostic, subtypes, genetics, and treatment management focusing on the advantages and limitations of ctDNA-based LB, including important bottlenecks and solutions necessary for its clinical translation. The latest ctDNA-directed CC clinical trials will also be examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.