ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2025
Potential applications of gene expression profiles obtained from circulating extracellular vesicles in breast cancer.
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Vesicles From a Model of Melanoma Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Induce Changes in Brain Microvascular Cells Consistent With Pre-Metastatic Niche Priming.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025Article
- The impact of liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining the landscape of non-invasive precision oncology.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liquid biopsy-based biomarkers offer several advantages since they are minimally invasive, can be useful in longitudinal monitoring of the disease and have higher patient compliance. We describe a protocol using minimal volumes of archival and prospective serum/plasma samples to define the RNA contents of EVs and discuss its benefits and limitations. Methods: RNA-seq analysis of matched tumor biopsy, circulating EVs from breast cancer patients (EV-C, n = 26) and healthy donors (EV-H, n = 4) was performed and differentially expressed genes were validated by RT-PCR in a separate series of samples (EV-C, n = 32 and EV-H, n = 22). A total of 84 samples were studied. Results: RNA-seq data from 500 μl serum samples yielded more than 17000 genes, of which 320 were DEGs (adjusted p value ≤ 0.05) between EV-C and EV-H samples. Pathways for Myc V1, reactive oxygen species, angiogenesis, allograft rejection and Interferon regulated genes were over-represented in EV-C samples. Computational deconvolution algorithms for cell signatures identified immune cells such as Th1 and memory T-cells, endothelial cells, and osteoblasts from the stromal compartment as significant. Top 6 genes were validated by qRT-PCR in all samples (n = 84) and they consistently and correctly classified cancer and healthy groups. An independent set of 374 and 640 DEGs could segregate ER positive/ER negative and non-metastatic versus metastatic samples, respectively. EVs from metastatic samples had higher variability in gene expression patterns whereas those from non-metastatic samples showed a better correlation. Conclusion: By using low serum amounts successfully for EV transcriptomics, we demonstrate that a minimally invasive technique could be converted to a microinvasive format. These data lay the foundation for EV RNA based biomarker discovery for segregating breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.