ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2024
Early experience with baroreflex activation therapy from a vascular surgery perspective.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 2-Year Follow-Up of Baroreflex Activation Therapy for Severe Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is an emerging device-based treatment for patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction refractory to maximally tolerated goal-directed medical therapy. Currently, there is sparse literature on the critical role that vascular surgeons serve in the delivery of this novel therapy. This single-institution series describes the creation of a BAT program and elaborates on the function of vascular surgeons in the multidisciplinary heart failure team. The preoperative evaluation, perioperative care, and postoperative course of patients receiving BAT from March 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Eleven patients were evaluated by a dedicated heart failure cardiologist for medical eligibility and assessed by a vascular surgeon for technical feasibility. Of the 11 patients, 7 were men (63.6%). The median age was 60.5 years (range, 44-73 years). No patient (0.00%) had existing carotid artery disease, and one patient (9.1%) had undergone previous neck radiation therapy. All 11 patients (100%) had an existing cardiac implantable electronic device, and BAT implantation was performed on the same side as the cardiac implantable electronic device in two patients (18.1%). Four patients (36.4%) required preoperative hospital admission for medical optimization before surgery. The median length of surgery was 82 minutes (range, 58-113 minutes), and the median length of stay in the hospital after surgery was 1 day (range, 0-6 days). No major adverse neurologic or cardiovascular events, cranial nerve injuries, device complications requiring reintervention, or heart failure-related mortality at 6 months occurred. Three patients (27.3%) experienced extraneous stimulations, which affected BAT tolerability. Within 6 months after BAT implantation, no significant improvements were observed for several heart failure disease burden markers compared with 6 months before BAT implantation. Our early results demonstrate that BAT implantation is a safe procedure with rare complications. Vascular surgeons play an important role in the multidisciplinary delivery of this novel device-based therapy. More data are needed to understand whether BAT is beneficial in the treatment of heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction refractory to maximally tolerated goal-directed medical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.