Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40027307›Full record

ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2024

Global requirements for manufacturing and validation of clinical grade extracellular vesicles.

Abhimanyu Thakur, Deepika Rai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abhimanyu ThakurDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Deepika RaiSmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanovesicles released from different cell types from biofluids such as blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. They vary in size and biomarkers, and their biogenesis pathways allow them to be divided into three major types: exosomes, micro-vesicles, and apoptotic bodies. EVs have been studied in the context of diagnosis and therapeutic intervention of various pathological conditions such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and pulmonary diseases. However, the production of EV-based therapeutics can be affected by the source, heterogeneity, or disease, raising questions about the manufacturing and validation of EVs of clinical grade and their scope regarding good manufacturing practice (GMP) in the industry. To address this, we have discussed the state-of-the-art requirements for EV production that must occur in a GMP-compliant environment with a reliable and traceable source. Additionally, EVs' homogeneity and the therapeutics' purity and stability must be analyzed and validated. Quality control measures must also be established to ensure the safety and efficacy of EVs. In conclusion, these considerations must be weighed carefully when manufacturing and validating EVs of clinical grade to ensure their safety and efficacy for therapeutic use.

Indexed as

Apoptotic bodiesClinical grade productExosomesExtracellular vesiclesMicro vesicles

Identifiers

PMID40027307
PMCPMC11863704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.