ArticleClinical epidemiology2025
Incidence and Risk Factors of Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis in Psychiatric Inpatients by Applying Machine Learning to Electronic Health Records: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychiatric inpatients face an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) due to their psychiatric conditions and pharmacological treatments. However, research focusing on this population remains limited. Methods: This study analyzed 17,434 psychiatric inpatients at Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, incorporating data on demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, physical illnesses, laboratory results, and medication use. Predictive models for DVT were developed using logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting). Feature importance was assessed using the random forest model. Results: The DVT incidence among psychiatric inpatients was 1.6%. Predictive model performance, measured by the area under the curve (AUC), showed logistic regression (0.900), random forest (0.885), SVM (0.890), and XGBoost (0.889) performed well. Logistic regression and random forest models exhibited optimal overall performance, while XGBoost excelled in recall. Significant predictors of DVT included elevated D-dimer levels, age, Alzheimer's disease, and Madopar use. Conclusion: Psychiatric inpatients require vigilance for DVT risk, with factors like D-dimer levels and age serving as critical indicators. Machine learning models effectively predict DVT risk, enabling early detection and personalized prevention strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.