Modern ultrasound techniques for diagnosing liver steatosis and fibrosis: A systematic review with a focus on biopsy comparison.

backgroundThis review evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of various ultrasound (US) methods compared to liver biopsy.

aimTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of US techniques in assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis in adults, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) as the standard measure.

methodsThe review included original retrospective or prospective studies published in the last three years in peer-reviewed medical journals, that reported AUROC values. Studies were identified through PubMed searches on January 3 and April 30, 2024. Quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results were tabulated according to the diagnostic method and the type of liver pathology.

resultsThe review included 52 studies. For liver fibrosis detection, 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) AUROCs ranged from 0.54 to 0.994, showing better accuracy for advanced stages. Modifications, including 2D-SWE with propagation map guidance and supersonic imagine achieved AUROCs of 0.84 to nearly 1.0. point SWE and classical SWE had AUROCs of 0.741-0.99, and 0.507-0.995, respectively. Transient elastography (TE), visual TE, vibration-controlled TE (VCTE), and FibroTouch reported AUROCs close to 1.0. For steatosis, VCTE with controlled attenuation parameter showed AUROCs up to 0.89 (for ≥ S1), acoustic radiation force impulse ranged from 0.762 to 0.784, US attenuation parameter from 0.88 to 0.93, and normalized local variance measurement from 0.583 to 0.875. Most studies had a low risk of bias across all or most domains, but evidence was limited by variability in study quality and small sample sizes. Innovative SWE variants were evaluated in a single study.

conclusionModern US techniques can serve as effective noninvasive diagnostic tools for liver fibrosis and steatosis, with the potential to reduce the reliance on biopsies.