ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Basis function model to extract the combined confocal and fall-off function from multiple optical coherence tomography A-scans.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Many derivatives of optical coherence tomography (OCT) rely on the depth-dependent information of the sample in the image. System depth-dependent effects, such as the confocal effect and the sensitivity fall-off, should be corrected to improve the accuracy of the images and information derived from them. Aim: We developed a new single-shot method to extract the combined confocal and fall-off functions and remove system-generated depth-dependent effects from OCT images. Approach: The combined function is modeled as a linear combination of basis functions whose coefficients are found from two or more A-scans (or B-scans) of a sample that are vertically shifted within the imaging range. No prior knowledge of the OCT system parameters or assumed form for the confocal and fall-off functions is needed. Results: The method was derived and validated with simulations and OCT images of a phantom, a biological sample, and human retina. Improvement over the Ratio Fit method was demonstrated. Conclusions: The improvement in the extraction of the combined confocal and fall-off effects by this method should lead to improved medical diagnosis through more accurate attenuation coefficient calculations. The method enables future applications of OCT where precise removal of all depth-dependent effects on OCT images is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.