ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Identification of potential diagnostic targets and therapeutic strategies for anoikis-related biomarkers in lung squamous cell carcinoma using machine learning and computational virtual screening.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a common subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) characterized by high invasiveness, high metastatic potential, and drug resistance, resulting in poor patient prognosis. Anoikis, a specific form of apoptosis triggered by cell detachment from the extracellular matrix (ECM), plays a crucial role in tumor metastasis. Resistance to anoikis is a key mechanism by which cancer cells acquire metastatic potential. Although several studies have identified biomarkers related to LUSC, the role of anoikis-related genes (ARGs) remains largely unexplored. Methods: Anoikis-related genes were obtained from the Harmonizome and GeneCards databases, and 222 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in LUSC were identified via differential expression analysis. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified 74 ARGs significantly associated with survival, and a prognostic model comprising 8 ARGs was developed using LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The model was internally validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves. Differences in immune cell infiltration and gene expression between high- and low-risk groups were analyzed. Virtual drug screening and molecular dynamics simulations were performed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of CSNK2A1, a key gene in the model. Finally, Results: The 8-gene prognostic model demonstrated excellent predictive performance and stability. Significant differences in immune cell infiltration and immune microenvironment characteristics were observed between the high- and low-risk groups, suggesting the critical role of ARGs in shaping the immune landscape of LUSC. Virtual drug screening identified Dihydroergotamine as having the highest binding affinity for CSNK2A1. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that the CSNK2A1-Dihydroergotamine complex exhibited strong binding stability. Further Conclusion: This study is the first to construct an anoikis-related prognostic model for LUSC, highlighting its role in the tumor immune microenvironment and providing insights into personalized therapy. Dihydroergotamine exhibited significant anti-LUSC activity and holds promise as a potential therapeutic agent. CSNK2A1 emerged as a robust candidate for early diagnosis and a therapeutic target in LUSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.