ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025
Gender differences in cognitive performance among young adults with first-episode schizophrenia in China.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adjunctive transcranial direct current stimulation for cognitive improvement in schizophrenia: insights from a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Gender differences in working memory impairment and metabolic characteristics among patients with stable schizophrenia: a cross-sectional study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Decreased serum IGFBP-7 level is associated with cognitive impairment in first-episode drug-naïve adolescent-onset schizophrenia.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- Divergent age-related cognitive impairments in first-episode psychosis.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
- Gender differences in neurocognitive impairment among first-episode, drug-naïve schizophrenia patients: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with schizophrenia exhibit distinctive patterns of cognitive impairments, which pose difficulties in patients' everyday functionality and reduce patients' quality of life. Previous research suggests that many demographic variables, such as gender and age, influence the cognitive performance profiles of schizophrenia patients; however, the gender differences in neurocognitive dysfunction among first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients remain less clear. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we compared the cognitive performance of FES patients to that of healthy controls (HC), with a specific focus on gender differences within the Chinese population aged under 35 years. Cognitive performance was assessed using the raw scores from the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Results: FES patients show lower overall cognitive impairment across all MCCB domains compared to HCs. Significant sex effects were observed: females outperformed males in aspects of speed of processing and verbal learning in FES, while males outperformed females in parts of working memory and reasoning and problem solving among HC patients. In both FES and HC groups, females exceeded males in visual learning. Moreover, employing a three-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) displayed interaction effects between gender and clinical diagnosis in areas of speed of processing and verbal learning. Conclusions: This suggests that schizophrenia and biological sex may jointly influence performance in these domains, emphasizing the need for early intervention and gender-sensitive approaches to address cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.