Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028607›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Key accelerometry measures for understanding walking sway during dual-task exercises.

Abdulaziz A Alkathiry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdulaziz A AlkathiryDepartment of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to identify optimal methods of acceleration analysis to accurately detect dual-task-related changes in walking sway. Methods: Twenty-six healthy adults participated in this study, undergoing various cognitive dual-task conditions while walking. Accelerometers were attached to the lower back to record center-of-mass (COM) acceleration in anterior-posterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions. Data analysis involved multiple computation methods applied to the acceleration data, with comparisons made using different frequency cutoffs and mean referencing. Results: Analysis revealed significant effects of dual-tasking on walking sway, particularly in AP and combined directions. A 3.5Hz low-pass filter and mean referencing were found effective in capturing these changes. Computation methods, such as root mean square (which quantifies the variability of COM acceleration) and normalized path length (which measures the distance traveled by the COM over time), showed sensitivity to detect changes in sway amplitude during dual-task conditions. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of considering both AP and ML sway in dual-task assessments. Furthermore, the choice of computation method, frequency cutoff, and mean referencing impacted the sensitivity to detect changes in walking sway during dual-tasking. These findings suggest that a 3.5Hz low-pass filter with mean referencing can enhance the sensitivity of dual-task assessments, which could be valuable for clinical balance evaluations or rehabilitation monitoring.

Identifiers

PMID40028607
PMCPMC11868934

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.