ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Beyond the status quo: when disease volume and metastatic timing are not enough to personalize treatment in mHSPC.
Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient selection for triplet therapy with darolutamide in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and patterns of administration: a Spanish multicenter study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- [Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary expert consensus on treatment intensification in metastatic androgen pathway modulation-sensitive prostate cancer: a case-based RAND/UCLA analysis.Drugs in context · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores the complexities of treatment intensification in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), emphasizing the limitations of using disease volume and metastatic timing as sole prognostic factors. Current algorithms focus on clinical factors like ECOG, comorbidities, and patient preferences, yet lack biomarkers for more individualized therapy. By examining prognostic indicators - clinical, analytical, pathological, molecular, and imaging - this article highlights the importance of a personalized approach. Multimodal strategies and predictive biomarkers are proposed to optimize therapy selection between doublet and triplet regimens, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Future trials incorporating emerging biomarkers may provide the basis for precision treatment in mHSPC, shifting management beyond conventional classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.