ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2025
Construction of a metabolic-immune model for predicting the risk of diabetic nephropathy and study of gut microbiota.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Lymphocyte Subsets Are Associated with Diabetic Kidney Disease and Overall Survival in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to diabetic nephropathy via affecting renal lipid deposition and inflammatory responses.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between gut microbiota and RNA N6-methyladenosine modification in diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Circulating Bacterial DNA as a Novel Blood-Based Biomarker in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2): Results from the PROMOTERA Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota dysbiosis in diabetic nephropathy: mechanisms and therapeutic targeting via the gut-kidney axis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the relative impact of risk factors for diabetic nephropathy (DN) during disease progression, with a particular emphasis on the role of gut microbiota. We developed multiple predictive models trying to enhance the early identification of high-risk patients in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe collected data from type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, categorizing them by renal function for comparison. Logistic regression identified risk factors for DN, and we developed nomogram and random forest risk prediction models. Finally, we analyzed the correlations among these factors.
resultsCompared to patients with diabetes alone, those with DN have a longer disease duration, characterized by abdominal obesity, hypertension, chronic inflammation, activation of the complement system, and declining renal function, along with a significant reduction in Bifidobacterium and Enterobacterium. Patients with macroalbuminuria exhibit a higher male prevalence, as well as elevated blood pressure and lipid levels, and poorer renal function. Increased waist-to-hip ratio, systolic blood pressure, urea, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and complement C3, along with decreased Enterobacterium and albumin, have been identified as significant risk factors for DN. The nomogram model developed based on these findings demonstrates good predictive capacity. And the establishment of the random forest model further underscores the importance of the aforementioned indicators. Additionally, significant correlations were observed among obesity, inflammation, blood pressure, lipid levels, and gut microbiota.
conclusionsDysbiosis, metabolic disorders, and chronic inflammation play key roles in the progression of DN and may serve as new targets for future prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.