Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40030049›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Patients' Experience With Evaluation by Both a Musculoskeletal Physician and Physical Therapist in the Same Digital Visit: Survey Study.

Mary I O'Connor, Carolyn Chudy, Kaitlyn C Peters, Megan Ribaudo, Carrie McCulloch, Jared Aguilar, Trista Taylor, Ryan A Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mary I O'ConnorVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-653X
Carolyn ChudyVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-2990-4269
Kaitlyn C PetersVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-1145-5664
Megan RibaudoVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-0563-5538
Carrie McCullochVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-9480-7058
Jared AguilarVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-7026-2536
Trista TaylorVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-0361-2282
Ryan A GrantVori Health, Inc, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2351-8983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing evaluation for musculoskeletal concerns are often seen by a physician and physical therapist in the in-person setting in a sequential manner. This process typically delays the onset of nonoperative care, inclusive of physical therapy, and creates the risk of inadequate clinical collaboration between physician and physical therapist. To address these issues, we designed a novel initial patient evaluation to a group visit in which both a specialty-trained musculoskeletal physician and physical therapist simultaneously evaluate a patient together in the digital encounter. Objective: The aim of the study is to gain insights from patients on their experience with this innovative digital simultaneous musculoskeletal medical doctor and physical therapist (MD+PT) visit format for the initial evaluation of musculoskeletal concerns. Methods: An electronic 7-question survey was sent to 750 patients who completed an MD+PT visit asking them to comment on prior musculoskeletal evaluations and their experience with the MD+PT format. Results: In total, 195 (26%) patients responded to the survey with the frequent body regions of diagnosis being lumbar spine (n=65), knee (n=32), shoulder (n=21), cervical spine (n=20), hip (n=14), and hand (n=11). Most patients had prior musculoskeletal experience with a physician or nurse practitioner (171/195, 87.7%) or physical therapist (148/195, 75.9%) with nearly all such encounters in the in-person setting (161/171,94.2% for physician or nurse practitioner and 144/148, 97.3% for physical therapy). Only 3.1% (6/193) of patients reported seeing both a physician and physical therapist during the same in-person visit. Patients rated the simultaneous MD+PT visit very favorably: this type of digital evaluation saved them time (179/192, 93.2%) and permitted them to promptly start their treatment plan (174/192, 90.6%). Overall, 87.5% (168/192) rated the MD+PT visit as enjoyable, and 92.2% (177/192) responded that it increased their confidence with understanding their medical condition and how to start treating it. Conclusions: Our early experience with the evaluation of patients with musculoskeletal conditions by both a specialty-trained musculoskeletal physician and physical therapist simultaneously in the same digital visit resulted in patients reporting a very positive experience with high satisfaction, engagement, and confidence in understanding their diagnosis and how to start treating it.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesPatient SatisfactionPhysical TherapistsPhysiciansAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesdigital visitmultidisciplinary caremusculoskeletal carepatient satisfactiontelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40030049
PMCPMC11893018

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.