ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Gene regulatory network inference during cell fate decisions by perturbation strategies.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding cell fate: integrated experimental and computational analysis at the single-cell level.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With rapid advances in biological technology and computational approaches, inferring specific gene regulatory networks from data alone during cell fate decisions, including determining direct regulations and their intensities between biomolecules, remains one of the most significant challenges. In this study, we propose a general computational approach based on systematic perturbation, statistical, and differential analyses to infer network topologies and identify network differences during cell fate decisions. For each cell fate state, we first theoretically show how to calculate local response matrices based on perturbation data under systematic perturbation analysis, and we also derive the wild-type (WT) local response matrix for specific ordinary differential equations. To make the inferred network more accurate and eliminate the impact of perturbation degrees, the confidence interval (CI) of local response matrices under multiple perturbations is applied, and the redefined local response matrix is proposed in statistical analysis to determine network topologies across all cell fates. Then in differential analysis, we introduce the concept of relative local response matrix, which enables us to identify critical regulations governing each cell state and dominant cell states associated with specific regulations. The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) network is chosen as an illustrative example to verify the feasibility of the approach. Largely consistent with experimental observations, the differences of inferred networks at the three cell states can be quantitatively identified. The approach presented here can be also applied to infer other regulatory networks related to cell fate decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.