ArticleScientific reports2025
Nomogram for predicting the development of pneumonia after colorectal cancer surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative inflammatory and immune-nutritional markers and postoperative pulmonary complications after gastric and colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical and inflammatory biomarkers predicting emergency surgical management decisions and postoperative outcomes in complicated colon cancer.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting moderate-to-severe complications following primary tumor resection in metastatic colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of immune-related adverse events and analysis of risk factors in older and younger rectal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the factors contributing to the development of pneumonia after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and to develop a validated nomogram to predict the risk. We retrospectively collected information on patients who underwent radical CRC resection at a single clinical center from January 2011 to December 2021. The information was then randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed on the training cohort to identify independent risk factors for the development of pneumonias, which were then included in the nomogram. Validation was performed in a validation cohort, area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves were used to determine the predictive accuracy and discriminative power of the graphs, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to further substantiate the clinical efficacy of the nomogram. A total of 7130 patients were included in the study. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis of the training cohort, age, sex, preoperative albumin, surgical methods, and surgical time were identified as independent risk factors for the development of pneumonia after CRC surgery, and a nomogram prediction model was established using the above five variables. The AUC was 0.745 in training cohort and 0.773 in validation cohort. This study established a nomogram that is a good predictor of the risk of developing pneumonia after CRC surgery and provided surgeons with a reference for personalized management of patients in the perioperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.