ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Association between lipoprotein(a) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diabetes Mellitus and Lipoprotein(a): A Determinant Interaction in Micro- and Macrovascular Damage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Lipoprotein(a) and panvascular disease.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Review
- Apolipoprotein E genotypes are associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Lebanese adults with type 2 diabetes: a case-control study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Dyslipidemia on the Clinical Profile of Patients With Uncontrolled Diabetes.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a known cardiovascular risk factor, has been hypothesized to influence the development of DPN. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the relationship between Lp(a) levels and DPN in patients with T2D.
methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI databases was performed up to October 12, 2024. Observational studies assessing blood Lp(a) levels in T2D patients with and without DPN or evaluating the association between Lp(a) and DPN risk were included. Data synthesis utilized a random-effects model to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsEleven studies with 18,022 patients were included. Patients with DPN had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than those without DPN (SMD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.19, p = 0.01; I² = 43%). High Lp(a) levels were associated with DPN (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.07-1.60, p = 0.009; I² = 62%). Subgroup analyses according to study design, mean age of the patients, methods for measuring Lp(a) concentration, cutoff values of a high Lp(a), and study quality scores showed consistent results (p for subgroup difference all > 0.05). A high Lp(a) was associated with DPN in studies from Asian countries, but not in those from European countries (p for subgroup difference = 0.001).
conclusionElevated Lp(a) levels are associated DPN in T2D patients, particularly in studies from Asian countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.