Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033558›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Do Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Interventions Lead to Schema Change in People With Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nadia Akers, Katherine Berry, Christopher D J Taylor

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadia AkersDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Katherine BerryDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-5462
Christopher D J TaylorSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-883X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative schemas have been highlighted as important factors in the development and maintenance of psychosis. However, evidence for schema therapy in people with experiences of psychosis and for schema-specific interventions is lacking for these disabling core beliefs. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) interventions remain a first-line recommended psychological treatment for psychosis, alongside psychotropic medication. The current review aimed for the first time to investigate if CBT interventions led to schema change in this population.

methodA systematic search of five databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) identified 19 eligible studies, of which 10 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analyses.

resultsA narrative synthesis highlighted the variety in CBT intervention length and focus. A small proportion of studies highlighted schema theory within their therapy rationale and within their subsequent CBT intervention. Meta-analytic findings demonstrated that participants receiving a CBT intervention experienced a significant reduction in their negative-self schemas at the end of therapy, compared with control participants.

conclusionThe findings provide evidence that CBT for psychosis can reduce negative schemas in people with psychosis. The review also offers a rationale for considering schema more explicitly within CBT for psychosis intervention studies and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotic DisordersHumansTreatment OutcomeCBTcognitive behaviour therapypsychosisschemas

Identifiers

PMID40033558
PMCPMC11876722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.