ArticleCurrent radiopharmaceuticals2025
The Central Composite Design and Artificial Neural Network Coupled with Genetic Algorithm in Optimization and Modeling of the Radiolabeling Process of
Article in Current radiopharmaceuticals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA promising material used in radiation synovectomy of small joints is hydroxyapatite, labeled with
methodsIn this investigation, a central composite design based on response surface methodology and artificial neural networks modeling coupled with genetic algorithm technique is applied to build predictive models and explore key parameters' effect in hydroxyapatite's radiolabeling process with
resultsBased on the validation data set, the statistical values demonstrate that the artificial neural networks model performs better than the response surface methodology model. The artificial neural networks model has a small mean squared error (9.08 artificial neural networks < 12.36 response surface methodology) and a high coefficient of determination (R
conclusionThe ability to generate more data with fewer experiments for optimization and improved production is a pertinent advantage of multivariate optimization methods over traditional methods in radiation-related activities. The central composite design and artificial neural network- genetic algorithm optimization approaches are successfully utilized to create prediction models and investigate the impact of critical variables in the radiolabeling of hydroxyapatite with
Indexed as
Identifiers
40033587What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.