Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033656›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental microbiology2025

Coexistence Theory for Microbial Ecology, and Vice Versa.

James A Orr, David W Armitage, Andrew D Letten

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James A OrrSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
David W ArmitageIntegrative Community Ecology Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.
Andrew D LettenSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-7942

Funding

Australian Research Council DE230100373Australian Research Council DE250100656Australian Research Council DP220103350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical models from theoretical ecology are seeing increasing uptake in microbial ecology, but there remains rich potential for closer cross-pollination. Here we explore opportunities for stronger integration of ecological theory into microbial research (and vice versa) through the lens of so-called "modern" coexistence theory. Coexistence theory can be used to disentangle the contributions different mechanisms (e.g., resource partitioning, environmental variability) make to species coexistence. We begin with a short primer on the fundamental concepts of coexistence theory, with an emphasis on the relevance to microbial communities. We next present a systematic review, which highlights the paucity of empirical applications of coexistence theory in microbial systems. In light of this gap, we then identify and discuss ways in which: (i) coexistence theory can help to answer fundamental and applied questions in microbial ecology, particularly in spatio-temporally heterogeneous environments, and (ii) experimental microbial systems can be leveraged to validate and advance coexistence theory. Finally, we address several unique but often surmountable empirical challenges posed by microbial systems, as well as some conceptual limitations. Nevertheless, thoughtful integration of coexistence theory into microbial ecology presents a wealth of opportunities for the advancement of both theoretical and microbial ecology.

Indexed as

EcologyMicrobiotaBacteriaEcosystemModels, Biologicalinvasion analysismicrobial ecologymodern coexistence theorysynthesistheoretical ecology

Identifiers

PMID40033656
PMCPMC11876725

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.