ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Free-breathing hepatic 2D magnetic resonance elastography.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging Evaluation for Steatotic Liver Disease.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Optimized acquisition for simultaneous intravoxel incoherent motion and RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the test-retest repeatability of a rapid, free-breathing two-dimensional (2D) MR elastography (MRE) technique and to assess the reliability of the liver-stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath-hold MREs.
methodsFifteen and 115 participants were enrolled in the technical repeatability and measurement equivalence assessment cohorts, respectively. All participants underwent rapid free-breathing and conventional breath-hold 2D MRE (twice in repeatability cohort) on 1.5T scanners. Both methods have four phase offsets over one harmonic motion cycle at 60 Hz; one and 10 cycles were collected and processed in breath-hold and free-breathing MREs, respectively. The liver stiffness measurements of free-breathing (LS
resultsThe repeatability coefficient of free-breathing 2D MRE is comparable to breath-hold MRE (LS
conclusionsThe nongated, free-breathing, multislice 2D MRE technique can provide reliable liver stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath-hold 2D MRE. It could provide a comfortable alternative method with reliable liver stiffness measurements for patients who have difficulty in suspending respiration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.