ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Multimodal machine learning-based model for differentiating nontuberculous mycobacteria from
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-Lung CT Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Classification of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease Across Geographically Distinct Cohorts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Pathogen Detection: Algorithms, Biosensing Platforms, and Applications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary tuberculosis: a bibliometric analysis (2011-2025) with narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Harnessing the gut microbiome to combat tuberculosis: a technological and clinical review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Distinguishing nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease from pulmonary tuberculosis using radiomics machine learning models from CT images.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal machine learning approach for the differentiation of NTM from MTB. Methods: The clinical data and CT images of 175 patients were retrospectively obtained. We established clinical data-based model, radiomics-based model, and multimodal (clinical plus radiomics) model gradually using 5 machine learning algorithms (Logistic, XGBoost, AdaBoost, RandomForest, and LightGBM). Optimal algorithm in each model was selected after evaluating the differentiation performance both in training and validation sets. The model performance was further verified using external new MTB and NTM patient data. Performance was also compared with the existing approaches and model. Results: The clinical data-based model contained age, gender, and IL-6, and the RandomForest algorithm achieved the optimal learning model. Two key radiomics features of CT images were identified and then used to establish the radiomics model, finding that model from Logistic algorithm was the optimal. The multimodal model contained age, IL-6, and the 2 radiomics features, and the optimal model was from LightGBM algorithm. The optimal multimodal model had the highest AUC value, accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value compared with the optimal clinical or radiomics models, and its' favorable performance was also verified in the external test dataset (accuracy = 0.745, sensitivity = 0.900). Additionally, the performance of multimodal model was better than that of the radiologist, NGS detection, and existing machine learning model, with an increased accuracy of 26, 4, and 6%, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study to establish multimodal model to distinguish NTM from MTB and it performs well in differentiating them, which has the potential to aid clinical decision-making for experienced radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.