ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Seeing red..? Co-design of a culturally tailored uterine cancer awareness intervention for Asian and Black ethnic minority groups.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: There is a lack of public awareness of the signs and symptoms of uterine cancer, and common misconceptions can lead to delays in diagnosis. Methods: A three-step co-design principle was undertaken to iteratively develop a culturally- tailored uterine cancer awareness animated video for Asian and Black ethnic minority populations. A series of focus groups were held with representatives from the target populations, uterine cancer survivors and healthcare professionals to firstly review the storyboard and script, and secondly to review the animated video and make adaptions. The content of focus group discussions and iterative changes were analysed using thematic reflexive analysis. Results: In total, 39 individuals participated in the co-design process, including 21 women from Asian and Black minority groups, four uterine cancer survivors and seven healthcare professionals, including three gynaecologists, two specialist nurses and two general practitioners. The key themes identified included lack of awareness, clarity of message, visual appearance and cultural tailoring, factual accuracy, and addressing misconceptions. The results emphasised the importance of co-designing health communication materials collaboratively with individuals from underserved ethnic minority groups, healthcare professionals, and uterine cancer survivors. Conclusions: The created animated video conveys key health messages by addressing critical themes including awareness gaps in reproductive anatomy, uterine cancer symptoms, and misconceptions about diagnostic procedures, whereas the use of diverse visual representations and simple language aims to foster inclusivity and cultural resonance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.