Evidence mapPaperPMID 40034565Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Adjuvant endocrine treatment strategies for non-metastatic breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Andri Papakonstantinou, Guillermo Villacampa, Victor Navarro, Mafalda Oliveira, Antonios Valachis, Tomas Pascual, Alexios Matikas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Progression-free survival prediction and comparative metastasis detection accuracy ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andri PapakonstantinouOncology/Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Guillermo VillacampaSOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Victor NavarroStatistics Unit, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Mafalda OliveiraSOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonios ValachisDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Tomas PascualSOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Alexios MatikasOncology/Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple trials have evaluated escalation strategies of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, including ovarian function suppression (OFS) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients and extended endocrine therapy. However, several aspects remain controversial due to the heterogeneity of study designs and lack of statistical power in relevant subgroups. We aimed to investigate the optimal endocrine therapy strategy. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed and last updated in August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating endocrine treatment strategies for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. In addition, an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the absolute differences between treatments. Study endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PROSPERO: CRD42023447979. Findings: A total of 37 RCT that had enrolled 107,684 patients were included in the study. During the first five years, OFS + AI was the most effective strategy in premenopausal women, while AI or switch strategy showed the better efficacy results in postmenopausal ones. Following five years of tamoxifen, continuation with five additional years of AI was associated with improved 8-year DFS (85.8%) compared to no extended therapy (78.1%) or five additional years of tamoxifen (81.0%). Following five years of AI or switch strategy, extended treatment with AI improved DFS (Hazard Ratio = 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval 0.73-0.90). Interpretation: This study provides information regarding the optimal endocrine treatment strategies for patients with resected hormone receptor positive early breast cancer. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Aromatase inhibitorBreast cancerEndocrine treatmentEstrogen receptorTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID40034565
PMCPMC11875833

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.