ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Adjuvant endocrine treatment strategies for non-metastatic breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Progression-free survival prediction and comparative metastasis detection accuracy ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and prognosis of patients with breast cancer eligible for adjuvant abemaciclib or ribociclib: a nationwide population-based study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy including GnRH-analogues and survival: a population-based cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- How to choose optimal adjuvant therapies for high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer after chemotherapy?Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Review
- A pragmatic, multicenter, randomized trial comparing morning versus evening dosing of adjuvant endocrine therapy (REaCT-CHRONO Study).NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Pharmacist-led remote follow-up service for non-metastatic breast cancer patients: a prospective randomised controlled trial of pharmaceutical intervention.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Trends in Combinatorial Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Across Six Cities in China(2016-2021).Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple trials have evaluated escalation strategies of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, including ovarian function suppression (OFS) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients and extended endocrine therapy. However, several aspects remain controversial due to the heterogeneity of study designs and lack of statistical power in relevant subgroups. We aimed to investigate the optimal endocrine therapy strategy. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed and last updated in August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating endocrine treatment strategies for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. In addition, an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the absolute differences between treatments. Study endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PROSPERO: CRD42023447979. Findings: A total of 37 RCT that had enrolled 107,684 patients were included in the study. During the first five years, OFS + AI was the most effective strategy in premenopausal women, while AI or switch strategy showed the better efficacy results in postmenopausal ones. Following five years of tamoxifen, continuation with five additional years of AI was associated with improved 8-year DFS (85.8%) compared to no extended therapy (78.1%) or five additional years of tamoxifen (81.0%). Following five years of AI or switch strategy, extended treatment with AI improved DFS (Hazard Ratio = 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval 0.73-0.90). Interpretation: This study provides information regarding the optimal endocrine treatment strategies for patients with resected hormone receptor positive early breast cancer. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.