ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2025
Bioinformatics-Driven Investigations of Signature Biomarkers for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disorder characterized by dysregulated expression of number of genes and their cascades. It is one of the most common types of cancer in women posing serious health concerns globally. Recent developments and discovery of specific prognostic biomarkers have enabled its application toward developing personalized therapies. The basic premise of this study was to investigate key signature genes and signaling pathways involved in triple-negative breast cancer using bioinformatics approach. Microarray data set GSE65194 from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus was used for identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using R software. Gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were carried out using the ClueGO plugin in Cytoscape software. The up-regulated DEGs were primarily engaged in the regulation of cell cycle, overexpression of spindle assembly checkpoint, and so on, whereas down-regulated DEGs were employed in alteration to major signaling pathways and metabolic reprogramming. The hub genes were identified using cytoHubba from protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for top up-regulated and down-regulated DEG's plugin in Cytoscape software. The hub genes were validated as potential signature biomarkers by evaluating the overall survival percentage in breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.