Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034704›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

XBB.1.5 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine protection against inpatient or emergency department visits among adults infected with SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 and XBB-lineage variants.

Matthew E Levy, Vanessa Chilunda, Phillip R Heaton, Deran McKeen, Jason D Goldman, Richard E Davis, Cynthia A Schandl, William B Glen, Lisa M McEwen, Elizabeth T Cirulli and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Matthew E LevyHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Vanessa ChilundaHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Phillip R HeatonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, HealthPartners, Bloomington, MN, United States.
Deran McKeenHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, United States.
Jason D GoldmanSwedish Center for Research and Innovation, Providence Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Richard E DavisProvidence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital, Spokane, WA, United States.
Cynthia A SchandlDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
William B GlenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Lisa M McEwenHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Elizabeth T CirulliHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Dana WymanHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Andrew Dei RossiHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Hang DaiHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Magnus IsakssonHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Nicole L WashingtonHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Tracy BaslerHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Kevin TsanHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Jason NguyenHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Jimmy RamirezHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Efren SandovalHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
William LeeHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
James LuHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Shishi LuoHelix, San Mateo, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of a multi-state viral genomic surveillance program, we conducted a case-only analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of XBB.1.5-adapated mRNA vaccines in preventing severe illness among individuals with medically attended SARS-CoV-2 infection. We compared prior receipt of an XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccine between SARS-CoV-2-infected adults with inpatient or emergency department (ED) visits (as a proxy for severe illness) vs those with outpatient visits (as a proxy for mild illness). Among 6,551 patients between September 2023 and January 2024, 6.1% with inpatient or ED visits vs 12.0% with outpatient visits had received XBB.1.5 vaccination (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.53). This protective association was weaker among JN.1 (aOR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.40-0.96) vs XBB-lineage (aOR=0.28; 95% CI: 0.18-0.43) variant infections (interaction, p=0.003). XBB.1.5 vaccines protect against severe illness, but protection may be weaker against JN.1 vs XBB-lineage variants. This study highlights the need for COVID-19 vaccines to be routinely updated to align with circulating strains and for individuals to stay up to date with recommended vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEmergency Service, HospitalSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinesemergency room visitsepidemiologyhospitalizationSARS-COV-2 variants

Identifiers

PMID40034704
PMCPMC11872700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.