ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Exploration and verification of circulating diagnostic biomarkers in osteoarthritis based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent chronic joint condition. This study sought to explore potential diagnostic biomarkers for OA and assess their relevance in clinical samples. Methods: We searched the GEO database for peripheral blood leukocytes expression profiles of OA patients as a training set to conduct differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis. Two machine learning algorithms, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), were employed to identify candidate biomarkers for OA diagnosis. The performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Furthermore, we gathered clinical peripheral blood samples from healthy donors and OA patients (validation set) to validate our findings. Small interfering RNA and CCK8 proliferation assay were used for experimental verification. Results: A total of 31 DEGs were discovered, and the machine learning screening found five DEGs that were considered to be candidate biomarkers. Notably, BIRC2 had a very good discriminatory effect among the five candidate biomarkers, with an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.697-0.915). In our validation set, results showed that the levels of BIRC2 and SEH1L were remarkably higher in healthy donors than OA patients, consistent with the results of the training set. SEH1L owned the largest AUC of 0.964 (95% CI: 0.855-1.000). BIRC2 also displayed a larger AUC of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.618-1.000) in the training set. Knockdown of these two genes could significantly suppress human chondrocyte proliferation. Conclusion: Two novel biomarkers, SEH1L and BIRC2, were indicated to have the capacity to differentiate healthy people from OA patients at the peripheral level. Experiments have shown that knockdown of these two genes could inhibit human chondrocyte proliferation, as verified by cell proliferation assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.