ArticleBioactive materials2025
Integrated biomimetic bioprinting of perichondrium with cartilage for auricle reconstruction.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprinting in Tissue Repair and Its ENT Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- GelMA Hydrogel/Alginate-Based Scaffolds: 3D Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
- Bioinspired and smart material systems for auricular cartilage engineering: toward microenvironment-responsive and self-regulating scaffolds.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Progressing Regenerative Medicine: Integrating Bioprinting Platforms for Stem Cell Applications.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Innovative Approaches in Microtia Treatment: Advancements in Tissue Engineering and Scaffold Design.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The construction and regeneration of tissue-engineered auricles are pacesetters in tissue engineering and have realized their first international clinical application. However, the unstable regeneration quality and insufficient mechanical strength have become significant obstacles impeding its clinical promotion. The perichondrium is indispensable for the nutritional and vascular supply of the underlying cartilage tissue, as well as for proper anatomical functioning and mechanical performance. This study presents a novel strategy for integrated construction of bioengineered perichondrium with bioprinted cartilage to enhance the regeneration quality and mechanical properties of tissue-engineered auricles. Simulating the anatomical structure of the native auricle designs a sandwich construction model containing bilateral perichondrium and intermediate cartilage, employing a photocrosslinkable acellular cartilage matrix and gelatin bionics matrix microenvironment, applying co-cultured auricular chondrocytes and adipose-derived stem cells creates functional cell populations, designing hatch patterns imitates microscopic arrangement structures, utilizing sacrificial materials forms interlaminar network traffic to enhance the tight connection between layers, and finally, assessing the regenerative quality of the constructs explores their feasibility and stability. The multi-level and multi-scale biomimetic construction strategy overcomes the technical limitation of the integrated construction of perichondrium-wrapped auricles and realizes biomimicry in morphology, structure, and biomechanics. Altogether, this study provides a technical reference for the hierarchical construction of complex tissues and promotes the clinical translation and application of engineered tissues or organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.