Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40035281›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

Influencing and Regulating the Estrous Cycle in Outbred CD1 Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus).

Clare Freer, Nicolas M Orsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clare Freer
Nicolas M Orsi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Whitten effect is a widely used tool for manipulating the mouse estrous cycle and generating reproductively active females within the laboratory setting. Typically, peak numbers of sexually receptive mice occur following exposure to male pheromones, resulting in a higher number of successful copulations on the third day after exposure. Although this method has improved efficiencies, the percentage of females mated and subsequently deemed to be pregnant/pseudopregnant remains relatively low, around 50%. In experiment 1, we aimed to 1) further understand cyclicity; 2) determine whether the initial cycle stage plays an importance on day 3 receptivity; and 3) identify any repetitive patterns/cycle stabilization. Mice (n = 27) were assigned to group cages according to cycle stage (proestrus, estrus, metestrus, diestrus). Experiment 2 was developed to determine an optimum treatment to promote receptivity by exposure to various pheromone stimuli. Mice (n = 45) were randomly assigned to 5 treatment groups (PBS-treated sham soiled bedding, male soiled bedding, live male, pregnant females, and lactating females). In both experiments, daily vaginal cytology was performed for 21 days to determine the cycle stage. Results from experiment 1 indicate that the initial cycle stage did not contribute to day 3 receptivity, although synchronization within several groups/cages was noted, and that the greatest numbers of estrous animals were obtained on days 6 and 7. Experiment 2 revealed that exposure to live males and lactating females both significantly improved receptivity compared with the PBS, male soiled bedding, and pregnant female groups. These results indicate that current strategies used for routine synchronization could be further improved through alternative housing regimens without compromising animal welfare.

Indexed as

Estrous CycleSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleMicePheromonesPregnancySex AttractantsPheromonesSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID40035281
PMCPMC11808365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.