ArticleInsect science2026
Insights on the nutritional ecology of a nocturnal pollinating insect.
Article in Insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional ecology examines the environmental effects on nutritional needs, food intake and foraging behaviors, and the use of nutrients ingested by animals. Adults of many insects' species feed on nectars rich in sugars allowing them to match the nutritional needs necessary for reproduction. Among insects, Lepidoptera are often considered opportunistic foragers that visit a wide variety of available flowers, although with some preferences. While nutritional ecology of diurnal Lepidoptera is beginning to be explored, very little work focuses on nocturnal species because they are complicated to study in the wild. To address this, we used new laboratory approaches to study feeding behaviors (number and duration of visits to artificial flowers, food preferences associated with the texture and odors of the flowers) as well as gustatory detection by antennae (proboscis extension reflex) in the male crop pest moth Agrotis ipsilon. We showed that (i) food responsiveness is age-dependent and increases mainly with sugar quantity and marginally with sugar quality, (ii) diet quality impacts feeding behaviors in the first days of adulthood, and (iii) male moths choose their food through floral cues. Taken together, these data allow to define this species as a generalist forager with a preference for flowers with sugary nectars rich in sucrose, fructose, and glucose. Our results thus provide considerable information on the close links between food sources and nutritional ecology in this species, which is important for guiding future studies on their behavioral ecology, population dynamics, as well as for population monitoring and for regional pest management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.