SynthesisStem cells translational medicine2025
Cell-based therapies in preclinical models of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Stem cells translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Necrotising Enterocolitis (S-NEC): Where We Stand Today: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Comprehensive Review on Toll-like Receptor 4-Mediated Pathophysiology, Clinical, and Therapeutic Insights.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The Role of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in the Treatment of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Multi-Prong Approach for a Heterogeneous Disease.Comprehensive Physiology · 2025Review
- Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in necrotizing enterocolitis treatment: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains an incurable gut complication of prematurity with significant morbidity and mortality. Cell therapies, including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), may be a promising treatment given their anti-inflammatory and regenerative potential. We assessed the effect of MSCs and other cell therapies (not classified as MSCs) on incidence, severity, and mortality in preclinical models of NEC. Bibliographic and gray literature searches yielded 17 371 records with 107 full-text articles assessed and ultimately 16 studies were included. These studies featured only rodents NEC models via combination of hyperosmolar feeds, hypoxia, hypothermia, or lipopolysaccharides. Ten studies used interventions with MSCs. Only 2 met the minimal criteria to define MSCs proposed by the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT). The overall risk of bias was assessed as high partly due to paucity of data with important gaps in reporting, reinforcing the importance of rigorous research framework, appropriate cell-therapy and outcome reporting in preclinical research. A reduction in the incidence of NEC (odds ratio [OR] 0.32, 95% CI [0.17, 0.62]), severe NEC (OR 0.30, 95% CI [0.18, 0.50]), and mortality (OR 0.30, 95% CI [0.16, 0.55]) was noted with MSCs treatment, seemingly more pronounced for ISCT-defined (ISCT+) MSCs. Amniotic fluid stem cells, neural stem cells, and placenta stem cells also showed a reduction in these measures. Given their accessibility (ie, umbilical cord) and proven safety profile in extremely preterm infants, our analysis provides a foundation for considering MSCs as promising candidate that requires further evaluation for the treatment of NEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.