ArticleJournal of animal science2025
The fecal metabolomic signature of a plant-based (vegan) diet compared to an animal-based diet in healthy adult client-owned dogs.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic profiles show few differences in serum amino acid, one-carbon, and fatty acid compounds in dogs fed a plant-based ("vegan") or meat-based diet.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the rising popularity of plant-based (vegan) diets for dogs, the metabolic effects of plant-based diets in dogs have not been thoroughly investigated. Evaluating the impact of a vegan diet on the fecal metabolome in dogs could offer valuable insight into the effects on gastrointestinal and overall health. This study evaluated the fecal metabolic signature of an experimental extruded vegan diet (PLANT) compared to a commercial extruded animal-based diet (MEAT) in healthy adult dogs. Sixty-one client-owned healthy adult dogs completed a randomized, double-blinded longitudinal study consisting of a 4-wk acclimation period, where all dogs received the MEAT diet, followed by a 12-wk experimental period where they either continued with the MEAT diet or switched to the PLANT diet. Fecal collections occurred at baseline (after 4-wk acclimation) and exit (after the experimental period). Fecal metabolites were quantified using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multiple mixed model gamma linear regression was used to evaluate the association of metabolite concentration against age, sex, and body weight, along with an interaction between diet and time. Sixty-six metabolites were quantified. Only 2/66 metabolites differed between groups at baseline and within the MEAT diet group over time. In contrast, 46/66 metabolites differed in concentrations over time in response to feeding the PLANT diet. At the exit time-point, dogs fed the PLANT diet had increased metabolites related to carbohydrate fermentation, such as acetic (P < 0.01) and propanoic (P < 0.01) acid and increases in sugar metabolites when compared to the MEAT group. These findings indicate that the fecal metabolic signature of dogs fed a plant-based diet is distinct from dogs fed an animal-based diet, even if both diets have a similar nutrient profile and are processed similarly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.