Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036327›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

The fecal metabolomic signature of a plant-based (vegan) diet compared to an animal-based diet in healthy adult client-owned dogs.

Brooklynn D Liversidge, Sarah A S Dodd, Jennifer L Adolphe, Diego E Gomez, Shauna L Blois, Adronie Verbrugghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brooklynn D LiversidgeDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaN1G 2W1.
Sarah A S DoddDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaN1G 2W1.
Jennifer L AdolpheDepartment of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, CanadaS7N 5B4.
Diego E GomezDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaN1G 2W1.
Shauna L BloisDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaN1G 2W1.
Adronie VerbruggheDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaN1G 2W1.ORCID 0000-0001-6366-8866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the rising popularity of plant-based (vegan) diets for dogs, the metabolic effects of plant-based diets in dogs have not been thoroughly investigated. Evaluating the impact of a vegan diet on the fecal metabolome in dogs could offer valuable insight into the effects on gastrointestinal and overall health. This study evaluated the fecal metabolic signature of an experimental extruded vegan diet (PLANT) compared to a commercial extruded animal-based diet (MEAT) in healthy adult dogs. Sixty-one client-owned healthy adult dogs completed a randomized, double-blinded longitudinal study consisting of a 4-wk acclimation period, where all dogs received the MEAT diet, followed by a 12-wk experimental period where they either continued with the MEAT diet or switched to the PLANT diet. Fecal collections occurred at baseline (after 4-wk acclimation) and exit (after the experimental period). Fecal metabolites were quantified using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multiple mixed model gamma linear regression was used to evaluate the association of metabolite concentration against age, sex, and body weight, along with an interaction between diet and time. Sixty-six metabolites were quantified. Only 2/66 metabolites differed between groups at baseline and within the MEAT diet group over time. In contrast, 46/66 metabolites differed in concentrations over time in response to feeding the PLANT diet. At the exit time-point, dogs fed the PLANT diet had increased metabolites related to carbohydrate fermentation, such as acetic (P < 0.01) and propanoic (P < 0.01) acid and increases in sugar metabolites when compared to the MEAT group. These findings indicate that the fecal metabolic signature of dogs fed a plant-based diet is distinct from dogs fed an animal-based diet, even if both diets have a similar nutrient profile and are processed similarly.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDiet, VeganFecesMetabolomeAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDogsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleLongitudinal StudiesMaleMetabolomicsalternative dietscaninefecal metabolomepet nutritionplant-based ingredients

Identifiers

PMID40036327
PMCPMC12056932

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.