Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Kisspeptin Administration Stimulates Reproductive Hormones but Does Not Affect Anxiety in Humans.
Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kisspeptin Administration Stimulates Reproductive Hormones but Does Not Affect Anxiety in Humans.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Trial
- Emerging peptide and neuroendocrine strategies for TRT-induced reproductive suppression and functional male hypogonadism: a narrative review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextKisspeptin is a critical endogenous activator of the reproductive system, with escalating clinical interest as a novel therapeutic for common reproductive and psychosexual disorders. However, conflicting animal data suggest that kisspeptin can have anxiolytic, neutral, or anxiogenic effects.
objectiveGiven the rapid development of kisspeptin-based therapeutics, it is important to comprehensively investigate the effects of kisspeptin administration on behavioral, biochemical, and physiological measures of anxiety in humans.
methodsNinety-five participants (N = 63 male, N = 32 female) completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover protocol (mean age ± SEM 30.9 ± 0.9 y, body mass index 24.0 ± 0.4), attending both for a 75-minute intravenous kisspeptin-54 infusion (1 nmol/kg/h) and rate-matched placebo (in random order). Behavioral, biochemical, and physiological measures of anxiety were compared between kisspeptin and placebo visits, using a state-anxiety psychometric questionnaire before and at the end of the infusions, and blood sampling (for reproductive hormones and cortisol) and heart rate measurements at 15-minute intervals. Blood pressure assessment took place before and at the end of the infusions.
resultsKisspeptin administration robustly increased serum luteinizing hormone to similar levels previously described using this administration protocol, confirming that the dose was biologically active (P < .001). State anxiety was not significantly altered by kisspeptin, compared to placebo (P = .13). Moreover, kisspeptin had no significant effects on circulating cortisol (P = .73), systolic (P = .74) or diastolic blood pressure (P = .90), or heart rate (P = .52).
conclusionThis is the first study demonstrating that a biologically active dose of kisspeptin to men and women does not affect behavioral, biochemical, or physiological measures of anxiety. Given that animal studies have yielded contradictory results, this provides key clinical data and reassurance that kisspeptin does not induce anxiety in humans and so informs the current development of kisspeptin-based therapeutics for common reproductive and psychosexual disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.