ArticleThe journal of ECT2026
The Role of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor Polymorphism in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Response for Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in The journal of ECT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and effective therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A crucial next step in improving rTMS therapy is to identify response predictors to inform patient selection criteria. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) exerts influence over TRD treatment modalities. BDNF polymorphism, Val66Met, has shown altered cortical plasticity after single-session rTMS in healthy subjects and clinical response in noninvasive brain stimulation methods in major depressive disorder, stroke, Alzheimer's, and cerebral palsy. We sought to evaluate the effect of this BDNF polymorphism on clinical response in a standard course of rTMS therapy for TRD.
methodsIn this naturalistic study, 75 patients with TRD completed a standard course of rTMS with weekly clinical assessments via the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR). BDNF polymorphisms were retrospectively compared in respect to treatment response and remission, baseline and final scores, percent change scores, and scores across the 6-week treatment course.
resultsAs expected, rTMS significantly decreased depressive symptoms as measured by IDS-SR scores. No difference was found in baseline, final, or percent change IDS-SR scores between polymorphism types. There was no difference between polymorphisms in IDS-SR scores across the treatment course. Response and remission rates did not differ between genotypes.
conclusionsIn contrast to previous research highlighting differential response between BDNF polymorphisms to motor plasticity and clinical rTMS outcomes, our data suggest that BDNF polymorphism status may not influence the response to a standard course of 10-Hz rTMS for major depressive disorder. Differences in TMS protocol, target, or BDNF serum levels may underlie our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.